This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Unable to build today, calls.c?

To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Subject: Re: Unable to build today, calls.c?
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:56:49 -0800
Cc: egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000316074643.11185A-100000@cse.cygnus.com> <20000316094539.A3265@cygnus.com> <20000317120125.A11857@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 12:01:25PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> ... the unadjusted_args_size ought to be original_args_size.constant.

I wondered.

> We really ought to kill the code duplication here.

Yes.  It might be possible for emit_library_call to gen up the
tree data structures that expand_call is looking for.

> May I re-try to install both patches with the variable renamed?
> or was there some other problems?

I don't know of another problem.  Lemme bootstrap here on a 
couple machines first.

r~

References:
- Unable to build today, calls.c?
  - From: Jason Eckhardt
- Re: Unable to build today, calls.c?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Unable to build today, calls.c?
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]