This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Fix gcc.c-torture/compile/20000105-1.c -O0

To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: Fix gcc.c-torture/compile/20000105-1.c -O0
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:37:50 -0800
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000319033356.A2031@cygnus.com> <jmem96tt63.fsf@envy.cygnus.com>

On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 03:51:48PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
> I'm not sure that this won't cause problems.  What if there is a
> reference to the addr_vec outside the block (moved there by loop
> optimisation or scheduling or gcse)?

If it happens, I'll treat that as a dead-code elimination bug.


r~

References:
- Fix gcc.c-torture/compile/20000105-1.c -O0
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Fix gcc.c-torture/compile/20000105-1.c -O0
  - From: Geoff Keating

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]