This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Problem with sibcalls

To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: Problem with sibcalls
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 22:27:57 +0100
Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at balti dot cygnus dot co dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003241514100.31919-100000@balti.cygnus.co.uk> <20000324132247.E19852@cygnus.com>

> > OK to install patch and testcase?
> 
> Yes. 
> 
> Jakub, I like this implementation better than putting the
> secondary loops inside mark_jump_label.

Agreed. I'll skip jump.c from my commit (but as soon as calls.c is finally
agreed upon - ie. whether it is safe to remove the current
current_function_args_size test or whether both are needed).

Cheers,
    Jakub
___________________________________________________________________
Jakub Jelinek | jakub@redhat.com | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/~jj
Linux version 2.3.99-pre2 on a sparc64 machine (1343.49 BogoMips)
___________________________________________________________________

References:
- Problem with sibcalls
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Problem with sibcalls
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]