This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Constant fold -A - B as -B - A (take 2)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at www dot eyesopen dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:36:54 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Constant fold -A - B as -B - A (take 2)
References: <20030208005431.GA30273@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302071855460.12887-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:07:07PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
> Is your use of the word "legal" based upon C/C++ standards?

Yes.  And GCC as a C compiler still pervades the optimizers.
Something that ought to be fixed, but isn't.



r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Constant fold -A - B as -B - A (take 2)
  - From: Roger Sayle

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Constant fold -A - B as -B - A (take 2)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Constant fold -A - B as -B - A (take 2)
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]