This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

From: Mike Stump <mstump at apple dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: mrs at apple dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:59:32 -0800
Subject: Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 08:07 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:

If we do this, I'd prefer to do it only for Darwin.  If someone set's
it intentionally, we should honor it if possible.  Since Darwin
ignores the limit, resetting it doesn't hurt there.

What's the default hard limit shipped on Darwin?  I.e. is it high
enough such that resetting rlim_cur to rlim_max fixes the issue?

8 [ tilt your head for that ]

Yes.

References:
- Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]